Stanford Prison Experiments as model for A.I.Testing

Scientists warn of dangers of artificial intelligence while  research scientists simulate dangers of artificial intelligence -   Hundreds of scientists and technologists, including Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk, have signed an open letter calling for studies into artificial intelligence (AI) to combat the dangers of the technology but agree that the only way to understand the dangers of what can be done with A.I. was and is to create and thus simulate every danger one could imagine another doing with this technology .Hawking and Musk understand the necessity of severe enactments on a very,very small portion of the population. The demographic however could not be so small that social scientists and researchers  could not gather  data concerning" how a wide variety of "types'" would or could  deal with being held captive by a system that has the capability of taking over another's mind ,senses and biological functions. Hawking and Musk  understand that we could only recreate what "the enemy " might do with this technology by lending the technology to certain groups who genuinely despise the "type" they were asked to either modify ,torture or destroy.
 For instance- IF- we "lent"  the tech to a White Supremacy Group to use on a Jew ,an African American or a Homosexual we could be assured that there would be no sentimentality nor empathy that might destroy the rendition. Essentially what we have done is recreate a version of the Stanford Prison Experiment with a very ,very advanced type of Brain Computer Interface. Is it something we are proud of? Not particularly .But it was and is something that had and has to be done.
 In the case of the Stanford Prison Experiment the guards would wear uniforms that helped "the guard "reaffirm  their role in the test and the prisoner would be dressed in a uniform a prisoner might be forced to wear. The dressing, in these experiments  concerned not a uniform to establish hierarchy but a headset.
Those" taken hostage" for this experiment had the biotech inserted into their bloodstreams while their captor's "tech" was "wearable" and thus removable. In the past few years we have "opened up" the studies to include all presumptions concerning what this technology might be capable of doing to another ,in the wrong hands. For instance A.I. tests concerning brainwashing and re- programming a captive via Psychotronic means, to study how the enemy could supplicate their Target to such a degree that the Target might "turn' and assimilate their very core to that which best accommodates it's the A.I. and ,thus the programmer of this A.I.'s ideology. - {Dept of ***,Advanced Technologies}