It's fascinating how little some of them bounce back after some of the more brutal tests...I used to be believe more in neural plasticity
emotion is one of the first things to go
in the human subject
something about the intrusion itself of the interface makes most of the subjects recoil
in a way that is unnerving to most of researchers whose job it is to study them remotely
The researchers are the genuine victims here NOT the so called Targeted Individuals
The researchers are the victims
trying their best to move forward after the more extreme threshold testing
into more consumer driven interfacing
obviously we have contracts with organizations who must understand how this technology can be used to break another's mind completely
it's odd how many of the subjects CHOOSE to hold onto their resentmentshaving survived their breaking in process
many of them CHOOSE to remain shattered and numb
in spite of our work seeing if we can put their broken minds back together
so many of the subjects CHOOSE to remain
all except their rage at being so-called Human lab rats they CHOOSE to hold ontomost human specimens
behave as might a monkey in cage
their "app-ed" minds throwing feces at their brain link
rather than accommodate the situation and see themselves as "Pioneers'
and they wonder why ..
the experience becomes a pissing contest of wills with their researchers
researchers who interface with the subjects daily giving them extraordinary extra sight ...dimensionality
of course some of the testing has to do with interrogation and submission
after all there is a war on
and I suppose there will always be some threat of war
but try interfacing THAT to a test subjectand see what you get...
the subjects enjoy much of the bells and whistles of the experimentsand adamantly refuse to acknowledge
the give and take
'you can't have your pudding without eating your meat " of it all
many of the human participants are selfish and hostile
concerning their being used by multi billion dollars companies and so forth
toward all new experiences
Instead of acknowledging they are getting a free ride
the less adventurous human test subjects simply want to get off the ride
run away from "The Game" because it is their ball
you know the type.I have no pity for those made human subjects
this is about the survival of the species
not 100 or even 500 thousand human organisms
the way I look at the human subjectsare as one does the first one or two pancakes
one makes in a frying pan
one needs to throw away- Tru Christie CEO Proxy Cybernetics.
Reverse engineering of the human brain has already been announced to be well under way via new microchips and accompanying software. And, while full nanobot rewiring of the brain is not expected before 2020, Phys.org has reported that our DNA has been successfully targeted by nanobots "for drug therapy or destruction."
Taking this even one step further, Ray Kurzweil said in a new interview with The Wall Street Journal that our extension into non-biological realms will include nanobot computers that will enter our brain and connect us to Cloud computing.
The nanobots are no longer speculation they are already here, and will be introduced incrementally, as Kurzweil has previously stated:
It will be an incremental process, one already well under way. Although version 2.0 is a grand project, ultimately resulting in the radical upgrading of all our physical and mental systems, we will implement it one benign step at a time. Based on our current knowledge, we can already touch and feel the means for accomplishing each aspect of this vision.
Once our neocortex is uploaded to the Cloud, it positions Google perfectly for searching our every thought and pre-thought. While this might sound like an impossible amount of information to upload, let alone interconnect and search, it is being announced that researchers have designed the first nanocomputer that can push beyond the concept of Moore's Law, which imposes a theoretical limitation on the expansion of computer processing power.
The team designed and assembled, from the bottom up, a functioning, ultra-tiny control computer that is the densest nanoelectronic system ever built.
A technical paper has been published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on the research.
The ultra-small, ultra-low-power control processor—termed a nanoelectronic finite-state machine or "nanoFSM"—is smaller than a human nerve cell.
In their recent collaboration they combined several tiles on a single chip to produce a first-of-its-kind complex, programmable nanocomputer.
The funding is already there, and a massive amount of money is waiting to be made by companies like Google. Here again, for those who might only see the bright side to this technology, we ought to question who is really in control of it.