the parents who claim the experiment mixing mind modulation and movies
wasn't properly explained
just how experimental nor modulating the film would be either on them or their children
less than 3 years old
preferably younger with little or no more than 5 or six words in their vocabulary and thus their
the class action suit was dismissed as each of the mothers claiming all matter of psychological trauma
were supposedly told well in advance of the screening that 'The Big Little " Test
was about researching the potentials of the cinema and neuro- tronic mechanisms used in tandem with narrative in fact causing Induced Trauma upon 'the participants"
furthermore the researchers and parasol pictures claimed that the point of this initiated trauma was to
give the participants/children a Head Start quite literally
in their development
by teasing certain neural peptides and "fight or fight ' receptors pertaining to either dissociative emotional states (to allow the children access to areas of the brain responsible for things such as "Remote Viewing")
or to trigger excitation of a children's primal brain to expand sections of the "reptilian brain" to allow high levels of DMT to flood the child's brain stem and temporal lobe
to allow the children access to what were simple called "realms " by the Edwin McGregor College of Developmental Evolvary
According to the Department of Interior Intentions all the mothers consented in writing to be"participants" in what was called Project Indigo or Operation Blue Screen
The experimental film created to attempt to cull quick change neural pathways was not than called "The Big Littles"
Operation Blue Screen
there was never supposed to be a 'The Big Littles 2" or 3 or 4..
it wasn't -that kind of movie-
as many of you are aware..
most of you not involved in some of this Human Brain inquisitive "project" only know part of the story saw in magazines
or Youtube videos or The Huffington post.
No reporters actually were ever invited to the initial screenings for security reason of some kind
thus anything most of the public heard about operation Blue Screen
now called "The Big Littels One" was and is of very little relevance in terms of understanding
the 'caal to arms" by many mothers who most depicted as in the media as either "litigious" or 'hysterics"
several important people in the Department of Interior Intent
made very sure the main stream media was kept-just enough- in the loop
to not be able to say
anything too derogatory
or alarming about what by than had begun to called simply "The Big Littles Experience"
meant to attempt to use some of the qualities of cinema
to stimulate and speed up the developmental phases of children ages one and half to 2 and 6 months
concerning rousting areas of the child's brain responsible for 'fight or flight" alterations of adrenal a,d limbic systems as well as the area in a child's brain that produces DMT.
As if to dodge the entire ethics of the Blue Screen Project
Parasol Pictures decided to recut the film for the consumer use
Not much is said anymore about what The Big Littles was really about
now that commerce
have made "The Big Littles" mainstream
A mainstay of popular culture
If you were not there
in the theater
you haven't a clue ...
many journalists un- sactioned by the mainstream media claim they sat in the initial screening surrounded by children and their mothers during Project Blue Screen
but their explanations of either the dynamics of the special technology used to create 'The Big Littles Experience"do not resonate with anyone
who was part of the actual testing .
Many "late night " talk show hosts and such claim they have gotten hold of the technology used to project this new type of film
in the very special way it was presented
with the original algorithms and light and sound 'tracks"
talk of diodes..and Direct Energy Beams
and 'The woodpecker signal' and Holograms
some speculated that the entire theater was "gassed ' with some far out hallucinogen..
yet I understand that all the original technology used to project the sensory applications to the "participants "were taken back to the Edwin McGregor College for Experimental Evolvery and kept under lock and key
Edwin McGregor stated that "The Big Little" Experiment
was not about film
and certainly "The Big Littles" was not made
not meant to make money..nor was "the test" meant to entertain"
of course "The Big Littles One" that I and you might have seen on Netflix or amazon
is the cut version
for theatrical release
(2) Only a very few
in very few zip codes nationwide
actually participated in "The Big Little" experience
and those who participated.
had ,in fact consented not only not to sue but also not to disclose the details of
"The Big Littles" Experience
all agreed to sign papers that they would not discuss
the nature of The Big Little Experience
except in various follow up sessions with researchers. in brain studies and psycho cybernetics
as the small child
it is too early to tell
as most all children chosen to participate in the project
were asked "to participate" because they could not yet properly understand language
or use language skills they had yet acquired.
(3)It was quite a few years ago when the notion film being used to "quick start" certain areas of the mind
that most children
in the modern age
do not access
as there are not that many tribes out there being chased by tigers and such in the brush
at least not in America or the UK
who also took part in the Blue Screen project
The use of film and Neuro technology to enhance the effect of narrative purposed to be terrifying
as dangerous as "being there"
was proposed to certain foundation and clinical research groups in the early 1990's
and than quite a few years after that
In the first week of January 2002
Parasol Pictures with the backing of Proxy Cybernetics and The New Way Movement decided to begin the Project post haste
choosing to use as it's platform 'The Big Littles" books written by a unknown writer at the time who was living either in or out of half way houses or behind a tent set up behind a mini mart in Memphis, Ohio
"it could have been any book we chose as a template "Edwin McGregor claimed
But I do not think this is true
but than again
I was merely on the sidelines when Proxy Cyber joined the team
and developed 'The Big Littles"
into a move -like no other -
and supposedly - so no other movie like this would ever be made again-
it was all just so - very risky
and to this day ,as I have written
nobody is quite sure IF the children exposed to the original " Big Littles Experience "
are different than those who did not see,hear, and feel
the film ,as I have said was about reactions
and terror being purposely shown to very young children
in a theater
with only their caregiver ,preferably a mother
to be part of the trauma..
a description of the movie ..concerning plot...by it's very
of course makes one stop and consider 'this type of material" certainly is not for children under 3 years old
yet each color ...each sequence ...each musical interlude
was scientifically based on both the limits and also the acuity of certain pre -language
sections of the infant brain
as the film, according to the Department of Interior Intent and the Trugenic Trust Foundation
was made specifically (the angles, the lighting, the pitch of sound, heightening and dimming of radiant light ,the pace of film speed ...) to over whelm a child's psychological and physiology threshold
before a single word or shot was filmed
a Team of neuro scientist at Edwin Cameron College of Experimental Developmental Evolvery
in Southern California
graphed out the film
from a mixture of harmonic pulses and microwave based "silent sound hearing" algorithms
a symphony, Edwin Cameron called it, of neural spikes and gradient p300s signals
the texture of frequency ebbed and flowed ,started and stopped .banged and boomed
with Frey Effect Direct Indirect sound systems
meant to evoke potentials in the neural synapse
and to send emotional and microwave signals of extreme low frequency not into "just" audience's eyes and ears except as after thought but straight to cortex.
first and foremost "The Big Littles" wanted to place a narrative directly into it's audiences head.
not with old wives' tale sublimations but literally upon the audience's mind and nervous system with frequency , pulse and wavelet.