Emic and Clic Markers in " Silent Sound " Non Lethal Restraint

e

To best effect a subject's emotional state with silent sound  one must understand the subject 's Emic markers .Emic markers are behaviors that are both correlated with a particular state and recognized by conspecifics as being correlated with that state. Clic markers, on the other hand, while being correlated with an internal state, are not recognized by the interaction partner and therefore are not used in the attribution process.Attributions may be based not only on actual markers but also on superstition,and misperception.

Approaches to the study of microwave hearing that bypasses a human organism's ears  does not rely only on repetition but cadence, tone and pitch. Each human organism "comes with" their own set of triggers usually based upon the tone and pitch of their parental or custodial" stand ins :.
 By replicating the pitch and tone of a subject's early caregivers we have a nice working palate to create variations of acoustic data based on such
In recent years thanks to electronics and recording devices in many appliances  we have been able to  record ,collect  and simulate electronic  aural input to best evoke reactions with aural  input based on Emic and Clic markers that are most effective if these markers (and sound ) is introduced upon a human organism that  bypasses one's ears. 
It should come as no surprise that sound  insinuated upon a human organism via Frey Effect or auditory canal instigates processing centers  in the regions of the brain that seek to translate  verbal and non verbal sound into meaning .
When purposed or un -purposed  "meaningless-ness" is issued upon the auditory cortex emotional centers of the brain takes precedence  over processing.
Misunderstanding sound in primitive times could mean life or death. The sections of the mind that seek understanding are also the sections of the mind that induce fight or flight and fear response.
One who imparts sound that seemingly comes from "out of the blue" upon a human subject must use the "source less-ness " of the "impart " to their advantage and later overcome the seemingly "source less ness" of the input  later on .

The goal is to maximize the emotional terror upon the subject induced with Voice to Skull with or without neural prosthetic when the distinction between the subject's own thought process and "other" are clarified . To best effect a subject's emotional state with silent sound  one must understand the subject 's Emic markers .Emic markers are behaviors that are both correlated with a particular state and recognized by conspecifics as being correlated with that state. Clic markers, on the other hand, while being correlated with an internal state, are not recognized by the interaction partner and therefore are not used in the attribution process.Attributions may be based not only on actual markers but also on superstition,and misperception.

To highlight the usefulness of this distinction, we shall consider two

examples: If we are interested in how we can tell whether our conversa-

tion partner on the other end of the telephone is smiling (as we actually

can; see Tartter, 1980), we do not need to investigate acoustic features

not transmitted over the telephone line (such as energy components

above 5 kHz), If, on the Other hand, we are interested in using the vocal

indicators as a diagnostic investigational

tool, we may not necessarily want to know whether anyone but the

computer can tell the difference. Scherer suggested (e.g., 1978, 1982) a

modified Brunswikian lens model (Brunswik, 1956) as helpful for sepa-

rating these two very different classes of studies . In its sim-

plest form the lens indicates an encoding process (externalization of a

speaker's state) and a decoding process (attribution Of a receiver). Infor-

mation may be transmitted through more than one channel, sequen-

tially and in parallel, with different levels of redundancy. Indeed, com-

munication is not context free but is embedded in a framework of

cultural or social rules and information, shared by the participating indi-

viduals. Information transmission may be disturbed at any point of the

process through noise. The model can simply be applied as an aid to

distinguish conceptually among the processes in (nonverbal) communi-

cation and be tested empirically using path analytic methods (Scherer,

1978).

Depending on the level of analysis or description used, researchers

have concentrated on particular questions regarding the communication

of affective state. The fact that each domain requires a different expertise

has discouraged many researchers from investigating the communica-

tion process at all three levels of description Or at both the sender (en-

coding) and the receiver (decoding) side.

The hurdles of overcoming the subject's eventual accommodating "silent sound " induction concerning  seemingly "source less" sound  concerns associations concerning both words and tone .
Sound "from out of nowhere" has limited association based value ,as yet seemingly source less sound is not part of most children's parentage and therefore auditory  'cue' and hence "trigger'  .
Of course the intial impact of sound from an unseen ,unknown source  has the desired emotional effect of either terror or the impetuous of creating delusion assuming the subject has limited or no knowledge of Psychotronic /Neurotronic Technology.
The subject can therefore  be guided to assume the silent sound is a " communion"with a supernatural force .The nature of "this unseen Entity" dependent upon the subject's  culture , religion and this culture's or his or her own belief system . Often a "belief system' is based on themes in Tv,film and literature more than organized religion. One can take advantage of established meme of "Illuminati", Alien Abduction ,Angels and Demons etc..
 Often the subject  will search for answers beyond "the mystic".In most cases with "Voice to Skull" technology testing or entrainment  the subject seeks psychiatric help . Inevitably the subject is given medication for  a thought disorder that quells sections of the brain responsible for the misdiagnosed  organic psychiatric disorder that presents with symptoms of hallucinations.
 Once the subject becomes aware that medication does not work "against psychotronic technology"  often the test subject   finds their diminshed capacity cognitively and emotionally  "enough" to best "deal with "the situation.
 It is best to incrimentally give the subject periods of "False Adjustment" and a sense of empowerment concerning the subject successfully  managing "the problem' before introducing aspects of predictive response concerning tone, cadence and pitch . Often what one "says" via Voice to Skull is of much less importance of "How"  bio electronic communication most successfully creates  psychological turmoil.

It is important to appropriate the sender message /receiver information as indistinguishable while garnering brain signal characteristics .The subject's thought process can therfore act as it's own 'fractal" template for individualized ,specialized A.I. alogorythems .Not all subjects will be fitted with neural prosthetic in some cases" Presumptive Interface" will be studied or subjegated upon the target based on "Presumed Response ". "Presumed Response " is   based on pattern recognition programs created not from a "Neural Read" but from recording devices in and around the subject's environment

.In either case the signal concerning auditory input must at first be as closely related to the subject's inner monolgue or percieved inner monolgue as possible. The basis of which might concern more traditional "mind scanning " devices( i.e facial /emotional pattern recognition,thermal imaging,pupil response ) rather than neural prosthetic .