Friday, April 17, 2015

XXXX (the journal)

 
Dumbo was never supposed to keep a journal.*
Nor am I.
But since he writes about me .
I am the XXXX
who lives with Dumbo..
and takes care of Dumbo.
THAT is my job.
I told him that he cannot use my name in his journal
and it's probably THE ONE thing Dumbo has ever DONE consistently correct.
but like I said...Dumbo was told in more ways than one NOT to write about his situation...
nor his childhood
that allowed for ..or was supposed to allow for an "ease of interface"
as Dumbo's childhood was indeed all about Initiated Abuse
to cause him to be as "applicable' ,"malleable" and CUE-able as possible.
but of course Dumbo fucked up the entire CUE mnemonic system he was supposed to "run on"
by looking up
all sorts of information he was told not to concerning Cybernetics and most of all Monarch Programming..
No wonder his Mandlers hate him...

I am not quite sure when Dumbo began putting "things" together
His entire upbringing was meant to fragment his 'Being" into separate compartments
so 'in the future" (which is now) all kinds of experiments could be done upon him (and the many other kids brought up Monarch Style)
concerning his mind having been broken enough
with both early technologies (voice to skull...i.e Frey Effect bone conductive hearing...and other ancient technologies such as holographic images 'beamed" into Dumbo's nursery ...
(cartoons ) mainly ...so Dumbo "would be used to...having  a 8ft Harvey
permanently attached to his -communicado...

Dumbo made an awful lot of trouble for himself going all Hardy Boys /Boy detective with his Neuro Linguistic Programming
and his research about things like Straight to Cortex sensory over ride..
He was told to "play it like he was either a junkie or a lunatic" but for some reason
Dumbo "was too good" to just roll with it..
Dumbo cares nothing about "the big picture"
so I can't really blame Dumbo's Mandlers for interfacing him "small pictures"
I sometimes "see him see"meant to terrify him..

the visuals and aural over rides seemed to get worse concerning what Dumbo's team assumes Dumbo did to Algernon...the Guinea pig with the hypodermic needle filled with mercury
Nobody ,even Dumbo's biggest detractors
really assumed Dumbo would hurt an innocent animal
but since he "supposedly " did ..and I am not saying either way...
this anti social action
has in essence given Dumbo's Team
carte' blanche
to basically
DO whatever they want to him concerning Human Testing
as they now feel THAT Dumbo has even less Human Qualities than they previously assumed.

I can see why his "team ' has had it up to here with Dumbo's Ruiner like ways..
he knew that his writing about Testing being done on Human's was
a gray area in terms of legalities. And also Public Relations concerning Proxy Cyber eventually
making it's brand of Brain Computer interface a consumer product rather than "just a torture devise"
but it is my job to always be on Dumbo's side.
since the first day the "Living Theater " informed me " I was physically and emotionally just Dumbo's type"
and a meet cute scenario was in the works
to "make me Dumbo's key Ground bound Mandler/Handler"



(2)
Evan ran a 3 second loop of Dumbo's dailies
again and again through the view finder
whoever had access to  Dumbo's Merge bio tech could use the interface either to go straight to cortex with a headset
or straight to Neural tape
or both Make "tapes"
Evan had been "inside" Dumbo  when Dumbo injected Algernon with Mercury
Evan FELT Dumbo's recoolection that "Evan said it would be a good idea to "play " with Guinea Pigs  so Dumbo could "let off steam" BEING a Guinea Pig...
and "That for Dumbo's " mental stability
Dumbo SHOULD feel HE too has the Power of a Mandler.
but at the group meeting that Monday
on of the "new guys" noticed "a discrepancy"
in the Brain  Chart of Signals that indicated that Dumbo 's pre- neural firing of evoked potential and thus follow through concerning INTENT
came from a region of the mind responsible for "lying" and the inner vision of imagined behavior rather than Vision that came from the cornea
.
Evan studied the  hardcopy recording of what Dumbo was seeing (and  hearing or thinking,feeling) on Guinea Pig Day
and decided whether or not Dumbo actually did inject the Guinea Pig
with mercury didn't matter
because ..the very fact that Dumbo
"could think" and also Feel the act of injecting the animal...KNOWING the pain this injection would cause
meant more than the deed actually being done

at the next meeting Evan Rainy,Dumbo 's primary mentor stated, "In fact THE VERY FACT Dumbo went out of his way to Envision this act
FOR his Team to be fooled
MEANS in fact that Dumbo is in fact much more sneaky and pathological than we previously thought...
Evan gestured for his assistant to lower the lights and project Dumbo's Mind's Eye vision of Dumbo poking the Guinea Pig with the hypodermic needle XXXX's handed him..
and asked the team around the board room to now place upon their scalps the head set that also gave "the team" a the sense of FEELING
that Dumbo purposely
faked while duping his Mandlers.

Making a gesture for the "team" to remove their headsets
Evan said," He purposely interfaced a sense that HE enjoyed the "act" whether real or Imagined. Did he not..?
My Question to YOU is WHERE did Dumbo FIND this Feeling?
and is it NOT perhaps more scary that a Proxy would intentionally
THINK this FEELING as subterfuge...
than IF Dumbo actually hurt the animal?

after all I graphed to Dumbo "It would be OK ...therapeutic in fact IF Dumbo "played' Mandler to "let loose " some of his aggression at being a Human Experiment..."

*
I reread passages of  Gloria Naylor  's 1996,her semi autobiographical 'semi fictional novel" about being a Targeted Individual..
I notice and not for the first time that she wrote of her covert harassment ..
from two points of view..
I realize that she (writing about the NSA) had to 'make up" much of "the craft"
and specifics of HOW her "Mandlers'
operated...
[I am quite sure none of her "team' whose job was to drive the innocent woman jack rabbit crazy
sat down with Miss Naylor author  of "The Women of Brewster Place}
and explained "the specifics"
enough patents and disclosed information of the technology is available online
as much of the same exact "tech" created and used to hurt others
is ALSO being developed by companies who only wish to use the same "tech" to help those with neurological problems and degenerative brain diseases..
and also "Gaming" /Entertainment"
I feel ...I am not "doing my job"
which often seems to be ..
about my recounting my "experience"
being a Targeted Individual as "see what happens to "sick" artists ...who dare paint about America and Hollywood.in "ways one must not"
...
a sort of "in house"
Life in a Chain gang
bio...
"a this is what they can do to ya' ...take heed ...take heed. "public service announcement
warning/example...

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah I think,find someone else ...to wring their hands and wail Help me help me..
just
shoot
me
======================================================================

.and it occurs to me..they wanted me to write about it..to be an example...and it occurs to me ...first of all I should re write that previous sentence in 3rd person...and re write the beginning of the story... for the first time I no longer write the word-story- in quotation marks....as the story, the tale SHOULD begin with the main character being a shill, a plant, a stooge, a person who publicly helps an organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization.

"Shill" typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that they are an enthusiastic or disgruntled member of "this group or agency" for whom they are secretly working.(even if this secret was kept from them for quite some time) The person or group who hires the shill is using crowd psychology to encourage other onlookers or audience members to accept the ideas being discussed by the "rube". Shills are often employed by professional marketing or political campaigns. "Plant" and "stooge" more commonly refer to any person who is secretly in league with another person or organization while pretending to be neutral or actively against

Shilling is illegal in many circumstances and in many jurisdictions except in instances disinformation and propaganda "serve the greater good ".

Shill can also be used pejoratively to describe a person made to act as a "symbol" who serves a political party's use as "one who needs to be dealt with by the state"never mind that "symbol's" income is tied to the prosperity of the industry or Power's that be who have asked he or she "to play" this symbol.

No comments:

Post a Comment