Introduction to Direct Energy Weapons and Wireless Electromagnetic Effects

 1944- during the final year of the war in Europe, the Germans installed and operated state- of-the-art high frequency facilities at Auschwitz to kill disease-bearing lice and other pests. These expensive installations, installed in response to the high death rate wrought by disease, worked on the same principle as the familiar microwave appliances widely used today in households around the world. These Auschwitz facilities, designed to help save lives, proved very effective. French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac briefly mentioned this remarkable disinfestation facility in his 1994 book about the crematories of Auschwitz.2 Also, French revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson, in an essay published in 1995, cited the testimony of former Auschwitz inmate Marc Klein, first published in 1946, about "short wave delousing" at Auschwitz.3 But the first qualified and detailed look at this subject appeared in two lengthy articles published in 1998 issues of the German-language revisionist quarterly, Viirteljahreshefte fiir freie Geschichtsfor- schung, edited by Germar Rudolf. These articles were based primarily on documents buried in the voluminous collection of wartime German records that were seized by Soviet forces in 1945. For more than half a century these important historical records lay forgotten in Moscow's central archives.

1974-. it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with  devices using microwave frequencies adjusted in such a manner to cause a person or persons exposed to such directed energy to hear sound inside his or her head to convince the human being they are either mentally ill or "communing" with outside forces nobody but the  individual targeted for such inducement can nor is meant to hear, Further development of this technology we hope  can also  instigate incitement of phosphenes in the target's visual cortex  as new ways of manipulating all aspects  of human perception ,cognitions and emotions emerge.

"Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to
electric stimulation unrelated to heat". Remotely pulsed electromagnetic frequencies pulses can be directed to  efflux calcium ions in the human organism cells ," Ross Adey,**** "and therefore  interfere with a target's concentration on complex tasks.

 .1982-    "While initial attention should be toward degradation of
human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects,
subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental
functioning, using externally applied fields"- R.Becker,***** 
  

1992

 

.At a Senate hearing held on August 10th, representatives from government, industry and academia all voiced support for a study after  police officers asked the government to look into allegations that radar guns could cause cancer. The police had some powerful friends. Democratic Sens. Chris Dodd and Joe Lieberman asked the NIEHS and the NIOSH for an epidemiological study while the International Brotherhood of Police Officers campaigned for a ban on the use of radar guns. At a Senate hearing held on August 10, 1992, representatives from government, industry and academia all voiced support for a study.
“Senator Dodd and I are going to stick with this until we get some answers,” Lieberman promised that day. Space hero Sen. John Glenn showed up and said that he was “extremely disturbed” by the reported link between police radar and cancer. And Dodd urged the NIH to get on with it because his patience was “about to run out” (see MWN, S/O92, p.7). That summer, the controversy was featured on a segment of 60 Minutes. But nothing ever happened. There was no study, there was no follow-up. The next summer, an epidemiologist and a pathologist jointly reported in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine an abnormal clustering of testicular cancer among police officers who had used hand-held radar guns (see MWN, J/A93, p.12). But that also failed to prompt any action from NIH. And five years later, the same journal published a paper pointing to a link between both testicular cancer and skin cancer (melanoma) with radar guns (see MWN, J/A98, pp.11-12). Again, nothing happened.
That same year fire fighters wanted to know if placing cell phone towers on fire stations put them at risk. Until a study can provide some reassurance that there is no radiation hazard, the International Association of Fire Fighters wanted to ban antennas from fire stations.
The fire fighters had a much tougher battle than the police officers because very few people thought  it worth spending the money to investigate cancer rates around a cell site. The firemen were told  that "If they really want a study, the union will have to pay for it. But even if the fire fighters pony up the money, it’s unlikely they will get any reliable answers. These types of studies are notoriously hard to do and, in this case, it will be even more difficult because the microwaves from cell towers are not very strong. It will be a torturous task to untangle all the various factors at work."
We must believe that the fire fighters have been warned about how hard the epidemiology will be. And that they have been told that it would be much easier to study those who use hand-held phones. After all, it’s essentially the same type of radiation and although the exposures from the phones are intermittent, their intensity is approximately a thousand times higher.
Another approach would be to study radio and TV towers, which broadcast much stronger radiation signals. That was the logic of Bruce Hocking, who once was the chief medical officer of Australia Telecom (later called Telstra). He wanted to show that cell towers were safe and figured that if he could show that TV towers were not associated with cancer, he would reassure the locals who were fighting cell towers. It did not turn out the way he expected. He found higher rates of leukemia among children living near the TV antennas in Sydney (see MWN, N/D95, p.1t).
To no one's surprise, a controversy erupted and no one dared to repeat the study. This too is unresolved.
As long as each group limits itself to a special case, there will be no answers. Progress will only come when the various factions understand that they have common interests. A useful first step would be for the firefighters to look beyond the towers and ask for studies of cell phone users. In the long run, that’s their only hope of finding out whether those antennas are safe.    

2001 September 12th

When the towers went down
 the towers went up
and up and up.

The exact number of people who did not "need' cell phones prior to September 11th changed significantly  . In the 3 weeks following  September 11th it is estimated that the sale of cell phones peaked to %s as yet unreleased to the general public. -Cole Cohen 2009