current is replication of the physiological neuroelectric impulses tetanizes the subject's skeletal muscles(1996)

2006- Applications of deep belief nets (DBN) to various problems have been the subject of a number of recent studies ranging from visual image classification and inner monologue classification to best standardize intracortical interfaces. But studies pertaining to alteration of more primal aspects of behavior that has little to do with classification has been based primarily  on conditioned response based on early premeditated imprints upon subjects raised for symbol and cue based Reactives .We now wish to move away from Cue  based  orientation and understand how a human organism  raised on Trauma Based insinuation or not might  step outside of his or her conditioning based solely on the mitigation of the subjects neural pathways that have nothing to do with integrated or dis-integrated "self" In recent studies on several subjects both raised on Referential and those not we heightened signal in the hippocampus by remote signal to discover if a subject could be persuaded to strike a pedestrian larger than themselves in physique and stature and next; not run away but stare down the now "injured"party with no concern for their own physical safety. In all cases the smaller subject behavior did not provoke the larger individual who had been struck (punched) randomly and without provocation did not  strike back. Both the subject and the pedestrian 's neural  scan ( vectored by a Neural Decoding devise held several yards away by a research student) were acquired for study. The "attacker's" neural acquisitions showed a heightened pleasure effect in all primary subjects after "the attack" and not during when the subject was enticed glaring at the "opponent" via  signal attenuated  to the subject's 4 th facial nerve to promote direct gaze. The neural data acquired from the 'opponent" registered first  "deer in the headlights "offset and next during "stare down" heightened  fear not registered nor decoded during the actual assault  . Boosting a subject 's capacities toward fearlessness via brain entrainment based only on emotional state may or not be  able to be combined with re-direct of memory based on lack of reciprocation /retaliation.	US5675103 A
Publication type	Grant
Application number	US 08/597,395
Publication date	Oct 7, 1997
Filing date	Feb 8, 1996
Priority date	Feb 8, 1996
Fee status	Lapsed
Also published as	US5952600
Inventors	Jan Eric Herr
Original Assignee	Herr; Jan Eric
Export Citation	BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Patent Citations (14), Non-Patent Citations (14), Referenced by (33), Classifications (11), Legal Events (9)

Non-lethal tetanizing weapon
US 5675103 A

Abstract

A non-lethal weapon for temporarily immobilizing a target subject by means of muscular tetanization in which the tetanization is produced by conducting a precisely-modulated electrical current through the target. Because the electrical current is a close replication of the physiological neuroelectric impulses which control striated muscle tissue, it tetanizes the subject's skeletal muscles without causing any perceptible sensation. The transmission of this current to the distant target is via two channels of electrically conductive air. The conductive channels are created by multi-photon and collisional ionization within the paths of two beams of coherent (laser) or columnated incoherent ultraviolet radiation directed to the target. A single beam may be used to tetanize a grounded target. The high-voltage tetanizing current flows from electrodes at the origin of the beams along the channels of free electrons within them.