One ruling often introduces another.
Just as there were advocates pushing for a "right to be forgotten" from the internet by consumers. There has also been renewed "rights issues" for constituents to be granted leeway that information or posts deemed "questionable" by committee should be granted the same rights as individuals who may also decide that certain sites and information should be removed and thus forgotten .
Advocates of third party "data cancellation" that removes their digital fingerprints should go "both" ways .And that the question of deletion should not only be granted to the "postee" but the "audience of certain posts
Servers and citizens according to advocates of 3rd party discretion must also have a say in deleted data specifically concerning "questionable ".Especially electronically posted published material that might deemed irresponsible, unsound or in format..there is "fairness" in the new rulings to be "forgotten or deleted" from the internet some argue only if that fairness goes two ways . Committees or panels must also be granted discretion to find "best interest" justification in erasing certain information that has been deemed unwholesome or irresponsible.
.-Dr Eileen Rosen
Clearwater FLA
Just as there were advocates pushing for a "right to be forgotten" from the internet by consumers. There has also been renewed "rights issues" for constituents to be granted leeway that information or posts deemed "questionable" by committee should be granted the same rights as individuals who may also decide that certain sites and information should be removed and thus forgotten .
Advocates of third party "data cancellation" that removes their digital fingerprints should go "both" ways .And that the question of deletion should not only be granted to the "postee" but the "audience of certain posts
Servers and citizens according to advocates of 3rd party discretion must also have a say in deleted data specifically concerning "questionable ".Especially electronically posted published material that might deemed irresponsible, unsound or in format..there is "fairness" in the new rulings to be "forgotten or deleted" from the internet some argue only if that fairness goes two ways . Committees or panels must also be granted discretion to find "best interest" justification in erasing certain information that has been deemed unwholesome or irresponsible.
.-Dr Eileen Rosen
Clearwater FLA
No comments:
Post a Comment