Wednesday, March 13, 2024





The mental capacity of an individual with intellectual disabilities who is also experiencing psychosis may not be adequate to give informed consent for social media companies to observe them throughout their illness, especially if it can be demonstrated that they promoted the progression of their illness by misleading users (individuals seeking help for their auditory hallucinations and paranoia on social media) into perceiving their auditory hallucinations as "remote neural monitoring" or Voice to Skull, and their fear of surveillance as 'gangstalking.' Contract law has evolved to take into account the cognitive abilities of the individual agreeing to the terms of a service agreement. Intentionally convincing hundreds, if not thousands, of individuals with co-occurring intellectual, developmental, and mental disabilities that their voice hearing and delusions of being tracked is and never was not a mental illness that could be treated but a 'no way out' result of gaslighting, microwaves, and 'silent sound spectrum' devices could be seen as a modern form of hate crime.

No comments:

Post a Comment