Evidence indicating that social media platforms were aware of the adverse effects of "Targeted Individual" (TI) content on vulnerable individuals, yet continued to promote it, necessitates legal accountability.TI content targets individuals with mental health challenges, particularly those experiencing auditory hallucinations, by promoting narratives of covert government surveillance or manipulation. Social media platforms do not merely host this content; their algorithms actively amplify it to maximize user engagement. When users exhibit signs of distress, such as posting about auditory phenomena or paranoia, algorithms deliver TI-related content repeatedly, reinforcing harmful narratives.This engagement often leads to significant consequences, including social isolation, employment loss, and worsening mental health. The algorithmic systems, designed to prioritize engagement, perpetuate this cycle by continuously presenting related content.Given their comprehensive data analytics and user behavior monitoring, social media companies likely had knowledge of these effects. Failure to address this constitutes a breach of ethical and legal obligations.This matter does not concern regulating beliefs but whether corporations profited from exploiting vulnerable populations. If substantiated, such actions represent systemic misconduct.The consequences are measurable, with some individuals experiencing violence, fatal outcomes, or complete disconnection from support systems. A federal oversight body with authority to subpoena internal communications and data is required to investigate corporate awareness and inaction.If evidence confirms that platforms knowingly perpetuated harm, criminal liability should be pursued. Algorithmic content curation, when it systematically exacerbates harm, cannot be classified as free speech or user-driven.Immediate action, including potential legal consequences, is necessary to address this issue.